How to Submit Poker Hands to Your Coach (The Right Way)

Say your coach charges $200 an hour. And you are sending them hands that look like this:

"Had KK in MP, guy 3-bet from BTN, I 4-bet, he called. Flop came low, I bet, he raised, I called. Turn was a Q, checked through. River bricked, I bet and he folded."

That is not a hand history. That is a sketch from memory with half the information missing. Your coach can work with it — but they are spending the first ten minutes of your session just reconstructing what happened. That is time you are paying for.

There is a better way, and it is part of a data-driven approach to improving at live poker tournaments: bring your coach structured hand data instead of memories. This guide covers exactly what your coach needs, how to prepare hands before a session, and the workflow that gets the most coaching value per dollar. If you are the coach, the last section is for you.

What Your Coach Actually Needs

Most coaches know the gap between their online and live students. An online student sends a database export with hundreds of hands; the coach imports it, runs positional filters, isolates 3-bet pots, and has a diagnostic picture within minutes. A live student sends one hand from memory, with the stacks missing, the opener's position approximate and the flop "8-5-2 or maybe 8-6-2."

Many poker coaches use analysis tools such as PokerTracker 4, Holdem Manager 3, and Hand2Note to review hands and spot patterns. When a live hand arrives in a structured file, your coach can load it into the same tools, filter by position or street, and analyze the spot with far less guesswork.

When you send a text message with "I think villain had about 40k, maybe 35k," you are giving your coach a puzzle with missing pieces.

Here is what a complete hand submission includes:

• Stack sizes for every player involved in the hand. Not "around 40BB." The actual numbers. Stack-to-pot ratio analysis falls apart without accurate stacks.
• Exact bet sizes. "He bet big" tells your coach nothing useful. 2.5x, 3x, and 4x opens produce completely different decision trees.
• Position of every player involved. Did villain 3-bet from the cutoff or the small blind? The answer changes the entire range analysis.
• Complete action on every street. Not just the streets where something "interesting" happened. The preflop action sets up the postflop decisions. Skipping it removes context.
• Cards shown at showdown (when available). If you saw villain's hand, include it. Showdown data lets your coach assess whether villain's line made sense — and whether your read was calibrated.

That is the minimum. The more detail you capture, the more your coach can do with the hand.

The Three Ways to Submit Hands (Ranked)

Not all submission formats are equal. Here they are, from best to worst.

1. PokerStars-Format Hand History Files

For coaches who review hands in tracking or analysis software, this is usually the most efficient option: a structured .txt hand history file with positions, stacks, actions, bet sizes, and cards recorded in a consistent format.

Why this is the best option: your coach can review the hand in detail, compare lines more efficiently, and isolate the decision points that are actually worth discussing. No reconstruction needed. No guessing about stack sizes.

Some hand-logging tools are built to capture hands in a structured format at the table, which makes post-session review and coach handoff much easier.

2. Structured Text With All Details

If you do not have a file-based option, you can type out the hand in a structured format. This is significantly better than a casual text message, but it requires discipline.

A solid format looks like this:

Event: $500 NLH Tournament, Level 12 (1000/2000, 2000 big blind ante) Stacks at the start of the hand: Hero 85,000 (42.5BB), Villain 62,000 (31BB). Effective stack: 62,000 (31BB). Hero position: Cutoff Villain position: Big Blind

Preflop: Hero opens to 4,500 with A♠K♦. Villain 3-bets to 14,000. Hero calls. Flop (Pot: 31,000): 9♠ 7♦ 2♣. Villain bets 10,000. Hero calls. Turn (Pot: 51,000): K♥. Villain checks. Hero bets 22,000. Villain calls. River (Pot: 95,000): 5♦. Villain checks. Hero bets 14,000, putting Villain all in. Villain folds.

Hero's question: Was putting Villain all in on the river too thin? Should I have checked back given the 3-bet pot and Villain's check-call on the turn?

Notice how every number is there. Stacks, blind level, bet sizes, pot sizes. Your coach can actually analyze this hand without asking you five follow-up questions.

3. Casual Text or Voice Memo

This is what most live students send. It is also what wastes the most coaching time.

Casual submissions almost always have missing stack sizes, approximate bet amounts, and incomplete action sequences. Your coach ends up spending the first chunk of your session asking, "How much did he bet? What position were you in? What were the effective stacks?"

If this is your only option, at least include: effective stacks in BB, exact positions, and bet sizes as specific numbers (not "he bet big" or "I raised a lot").

Add Context Notes

A hand history covers the mechanics: positions, stacks, bets, cards. It does not capture what shaped your decisions in real time. Before you send hands, add a line or two to each:

• Your read on the villain. "Older player, seemed tight-passive, had been folding to aggression all day."
• Your reasoning at the key decision. "I 3-bet because I thought his cutoff range was wide and he had been opening frequently."
• Table dynamics that mattered. "The short stack had been shoving light, so I knew I might face a squeeze."

Then add a short note for the batch as a whole: the event and buy-in, whether the table was loose or tight, how you were running, and what you want the coach to focus on. These notes turn a hand history into a case study. Your coach can evaluate not just what you did but why, and whether your reasoning holds up even when the result did not.

How Many Hands to Send Before a Session

More is not always better. Most coaches prefer quality over quantity for session prep.

A good starting point: 5–8 hands per coaching session, selected for variety, each with the question you want answered. Send hands where you genuinely did not know the right play — not just bad-beat stories or hands where you already know you messed up.

Pick hands from different spots:

• A preflop decision where you were unsure (cold-call or 3-bet?)
• A postflop sizing decision (bet big or small on a wet board?)
• A river decision where you tanked (hero-call or fold?)
• A hand where you think you played well but want confirmation
• A hand from a stage of the tournament you find difficult (bubble play, final table with short stacks)

If your logging produces a file, send the whole session's export alongside your picks. Your coach can then filter across everything you logged, not just the hands you chose, and that is often where broader patterns and repeat leaks start to show up.

Treat 5–8 as a place to start, not a rule. The best study plan is one you build with your coach, and that includes how many hands you track at the table and how many you send. A coach rebuilding your big blind defense may ask you to log every big blind hand for a month; one working on final tables may want three hands with a long note on each. Agree on it at the start, and revisit it as the work changes.

When to Send Them

Do not wait until five minutes before your session. Your coach needs prep time too.

The standard: send hands at least 24 hours before your scheduled session. This gives your coach time to load the hands, review the action, run them through analysis software, and come to the session with specific observations instead of reacting in real time.

If you had a session last night and coaching is tomorrow, send what you have as soon as possible and let your coach know more may follow. Something is better than nothing, and most coaches would rather have hands early with a "more coming" note than get everything at the last minute.

For Coaches: Turning Live Hands Into a Diagnosis

Structured hand histories let you use the same diagnostic tools on live students that you use on online ones. A few practices get the most from them.

Keep each student's hands together. Import their files into PokerTracker 4, Holdem Manager 3 or Hand2Note, kept separate from other players' hands (a database of their own, or their own player name), so their live hands build into a dataset across sessions. The first sessions are limited by sample size; after a month of consistent logging, you can pull up their big blind defense over that month instead of looking at the five hands they remember from last week.

Separate systematic leaks from one-off errors. A student who calls too wide from the big blind once made a mistake. One who does it in seven hands out of ten has a leak. Look for:

• Positional tendencies. Too many hands from early position, too few from the button, or roughly the same range everywhere.
• Bet sizing patterns. Different sizes for value hands and draws, or 3-bet sizes that ignore stack depth.
• Street-by-street aggression. Fine preflop and on the flop but passive on the turn and river, or the reverse.
• Showdown results by spot. Losing at showdown too often suggests calling too light on rivers; rarely reaching showdown with marginal winners suggests folding too much to aggression.

Frame feedback around the decision, not the result. Use the exact numbers: what was the pot, the effective stack, the opponent's likely range, and what does a balanced approach look like before any exploitative adjustment? A solver output is a useful reference point here, and exact hand data is what makes the comparison possible.

Set the standard up front. Tell students what format you need, how many hands, and when to send them. Removing that friction before the first session means more paid time goes to analysis.

The Submission That Wastes Your Money

Here is what a wasted coaching dollar looks like:

You send your coach three hands via text message the morning of your session. Two of them are missing stack sizes. One does not include the preflop action. Your coach spends the first fifteen minutes just getting the hands straight. You get forty-five minutes of actual coaching out of a sixty-minute session.

Now multiply that across a month of sessions. You are losing 25% of your coaching value to a submission problem.

The fix is not complicated. Capture the data at the table — while you still remember it. Send it in a format your coach can actually use. Give them enough lead time to prepare. Those three things turn a good coaching session into a great one.

---

Get more value from every coaching session. LiveHands helps you capture every action, street by street, then share real hand histories with your coach for easier import into PokerTracker 4, Holdem Manager 3, and Hand2Note. Try it free for 7 days.